[boost] Re: range_result_iterator

From: Thorsten Ottosen (nesotto_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-05-03 02:31:48

"David Abrahams" <dave_at_[hidden]> wrote in message 
news:u1x8pceqw.fsf_at_boost-consulting.com...
|
| What is the rationale behind this name?
| It seems unintuitive to me,
| and what's more, unneccessary.

why?

| Shouldn't
| range_iterator<T const>::type just be range_const_iterator<T>::type?
|
| If not, why not?

container::const_iterator is the parallel.

-Thorsten