From: Jonathan Turkanis (technews_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-05-03 11:45:44
Thorsten Ottosen wrote:
>>> 4. Having a pile of names prefixed by "range_" (like
>>>> boost::range_const_iterator) just seems wrong to me when we
>>>> have namespaces. Is there a good reason we're not using
>>>> boost::range::const_iterator or boost::ranges::const_iterator?
>>> decision made in review or post-review. people like it that way.
>> Count one more vote against, FWIW.
> ok, will do. the question that I have is that will changing these
> names have any effect except on me which has to do it?
> if we can provide more thourough naming guide-lines for future boost
> libs, then let's do so.
This affects me too. In the iostreams library I had metafunctions named category
and char_type which in the usual case simply extract member types of the same
name. In the interest of uniform naming I changed these to io_category and
io_char, which sound a bit funny to me, esp. the latter.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk