From: Arkadiy Vertleyb (vertleyb_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-05-04 20:30:19
"Iain K. Hanson" <ikh_at_[hidden]> wrote
> > If Perl is better then C++ preprocessor, then it should become C++
> > preprocessor. But it needs to be built-in, otherwise these are apples
> > against oranges.
> With all due respect this misses the point completely. We don't need a
> text substitution tool for C++. We need something that includes headers,
> also pragmas, and conditional compilation, the rest IMHO is macro hackery
> and extra lingustic.
And template metaprogramming is just template hackery, correct?
I am just trying to understand whether your antipathy is limited to macros,
or spreads to everything that was not in the original design, and discovered
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk