From: Iain K. Hanson (ikh_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-05-04 19:43:12
On Wed, May 04, 2005 at 05:11:05PM -0400, Arkadiy Vertleyb wrote:
> "Andrei Alexandrescu (See Website For Email)"
> <SeeWebsiteForEmail_at_[hidden]> wrote
> If Perl is better then C++ preprocessor, then it should become C++
> preprocessor. But it needs to be built-in, otherwise these are apples
> against oranges.
With all due respect this misses the point completely. We don't need a better
text substitution tool for C++. We need something that includes headers,
also pragmas, and conditional compilation, the rest IMHO is macro hackery
and extra lingustic.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk