From: Jonathan Turkanis (technews_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-05-05 13:14:30
Gennadiy Rozental wrote:
>> important, if i is possible. Rather than reject the library because
>> these problems haven't been addressed, let's try to address them
>> during the review.
> That's unacceptable IMO. Review period is not a time to address any
Why not let reviewers try? No one is forced to write a review. If these issues
can't be resolved, and the review manager -- informed by the opinions of
reviews -- concludes they are show-stoppers, the library will be rejected.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk