From: Gennadiy Rozental (gennadiy.rozental_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-05-05 14:36:02
"Jonathan Turkanis" <technews_at_[hidden]> wrote in message
> Gennadiy Rozental wrote:
>>> important, if i is possible. Rather than reject the library because
>>> these problems haven't been addressed, let's try to address them
>>> during the review.
>> That's unacceptable IMO. Review period is not a time to address any
> Why not let reviewers try? No one is forced to write a review. If these
> can't be resolved, and the review manager -- informed by the opinions of
> reviews -- concludes they are show-stoppers, the library will be rejected.
Because review period is quite short and it's very easy to came up with
quick solution which wouldn't work in a long run. If issues couldn't be
resolved then it's obvious that submission should be rejected.