From: Doug Gregor (dgregor_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-05-10 09:32:58
On May 9, 2005, at 7:19 PM, Joe Gottman wrote:
> "Stefan Strasser" <sstrasser_at_[hidden]> wrote in message
>> you might be interested in this document from the new c++0x mailing:
>> for the naming discussion, proposed syntax is for(int i : vec)
>> (personally I don't care if it's called BOOST_FOREACH or BOOST_FOR)
> This proposal might be a good reason to rush BOOST_FOREACH into
> version 1.33. If the standards committee is considering adding
> like BOOST_FOREACH, it would be good for them to have some data about
> easy and useful the average programmer finds this functionality.
It's too late to add anything into 1.33.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk