From: Thorsten Ottosen (nesotto_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-05-10 13:06:27
"Pavel Chikulaev" <pavel.chikulaev_at_[hidden]> wrote in message
| Now, when we got rid of ptr_iterators, we don't need indirect_fun, do we?
| At least as part of ptr_container library?
you might still need it if you do
std::sort( vec.begin().base(), vec.end().base(),
but I would like to see the stuff being put into a better maintained utility
if somebody is volunteering.
| P.S. About copyability: may be then provide some cloning mechanism like:
| ptr_vector<int> a;
| ptr_vector<int> b(a.clone());
| b = a.clone();
| Where ptr_vector<T>::clone doesn't create clone immeadiately, but returns
| object that refers to this, and ptr_vector<T> has ctor and assignment
| taking that object.
I'm not sure what you're trying to achieve. and when is the clone then
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk