[boost] Re: [ptr_container] indirect_fun - do we still need it?

From: Pavel Chikulaev (pavel.chikulaev_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-05-10 18:27:35

"Thorsten Ottosen" <nesotto_at_[hidden]> wrote in message 
news:d5qspk$ap3$1_at_sea.gmane.org...
> but I would like to see the stuff being put into a better maintained utility
> if somebody is volunteering.

boost::utility would be a good place for it, I guess.

> I'm not sure what you're trying to achieve. and when is the clone then
> created?

As I said in private e-mail, that was not good idea and we won't achieve nothing 
with it.
But only if you make
ptr_container::operator = (auto_ptr<ptr_container>) works as expected.

--
Pavel Chikulaev