[boost] Re: parameters library and rvalue pitfall

From: Daniel Wallin (dalwan01_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-05-11 14:30:44

David Abrahams wrote:
> David Abrahams <dave_at_[hidden]> writes:
>
>>Anyway, I'm inclined that we not try to do this by-value return
>>thing.  Your thoughts?
> 
> 
> Still would like to hear them.

I agree. I think the current system is good enough.

>>Also:
>>
>>  1. for the lazy case we should probably use result_of<F()>::type on the
>>     compilers that support it?

Yeah.

>>  2. We probably also need lazy_binding<p, k, f>::type, right?
> 
> 
> Now done.

Great!

-- 
Daniel Wallin