Re: [boost] Re: Re: [Formal review] Singleton library

From: Jason Hise (chaos_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-05-12 18:53:15

Does anyone have any additional comments about the singleton?
So far the major items on my TODO list include:

* Provide a built in policy which actually locks using boost.thread's 
mutexes
* Use declspec for windows builds to make dlls work with singletons 
naturally
* Make the multiton fit the requirements for a pair associative container.
* Fix boolean conversion for pointers
* A lot more example code in the docs

Is there anything else that anyone feels is missing from the singleton 
library?  Even if you don't have anything new to mention, I would 
appreciate hearing whether or not you think the singleton is useful in 
its current state.  It will help the review manager a great deal in 
making his decision if more people cast their votes.

-Jason