Boost logo

Boost :

From: John Maddock (john_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-05-17 06:46:26


> Yes, please!

OK, done.

>> I can't see how they would cause
>> problems with other compilers: in fact I'm not at all clear how "cmdline"
>> was ever found without the qualifier on other compilers.
>
> The 'basic_command_line_parser' class template is derived from
> detail::cmdline, and so, I believe the 'cmdline' name should be injected
> in
> the scope of 'basic_command_line_parser'. Since all uses are inside that
> class, unqualified 'cmdline' works fine.

Understood, I never realised that was what happened to base classes, so many
corners in this language!

>> I haven't looked at the runtime test failures with this compiler yet (has
>> anyone?),
>
> I'll try to reproduce with my version of borland later this week. But
> IIRC,
> previously tests uses to pass for me while failing on metacomm.

I can reproduce them here, but haven't looked into them any more than that
yet.

John.


Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk