From: John Maddock (john_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-05-17 06:46:26
> Yes, please!
>> I can't see how they would cause
>> problems with other compilers: in fact I'm not at all clear how "cmdline"
>> was ever found without the qualifier on other compilers.
> The 'basic_command_line_parser' class template is derived from
> detail::cmdline, and so, I believe the 'cmdline' name should be injected
> the scope of 'basic_command_line_parser'. Since all uses are inside that
> class, unqualified 'cmdline' works fine.
Understood, I never realised that was what happened to base classes, so many
corners in this language!
>> I haven't looked at the runtime test failures with this compiler yet (has
> I'll try to reproduce with my version of borland later this week. But
> previously tests uses to pass for me while failing on metacomm.
I can reproduce them here, but haven't looked into them any more than that
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk