From: Jonathan Turkanis (technews_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-05-19 10:32:43
Douglas Gregor wrote:
> On May 19, 2005, at 2:21 AM, Martin Wille wrote:
>> Jonathan Turkanis wrote:
>>> I'm now testing the hypothesis that the problem is std::rand
>>> behaving badly on
>>> these platforms. I've switched to Boost.Random, and have left just
>>> one of the
>>> problem tests, newline_test.cpp, uncommented.
>> newline_test passes now (intel 8.1/Linux) taking only 1.2 seconds
>> here when I run it manually.
> Works on gcc-3_3-darwin, too. Thanks Jonathan!
No problem -- I'm glad it turned out to be something simple.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk