From: Douglas Gregor (doug.gregor_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-05-19 08:29:48
On May 19, 2005, at 2:21 AM, Martin Wille wrote:
> Jonathan Turkanis wrote:
>> I'm now testing the hypothesis that the problem is std::rand behaving
>> badly on
>> these platforms. I've switched to Boost.Random, and have left just
>> one of the
>> problem tests, newline_test.cpp, uncommented.
> newline_test passes now (intel 8.1/Linux) taking only 1.2 seconds here
> when I run it manually.
Works on gcc-3_3-darwin, too. Thanks Jonathan!
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk