From: Jonathan Turkanis (technews_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-05-19 15:30:04
"Dave Harris" <brangdon_at_[hidden]> wrote in message
> In-Reply-To: <d6dhiu$hai$1_at_[hidden]>
> technews_at_[hidden] (Jonathan Turkanis) wrote (abridged):
> > > Are we going to generalise it to allow any (compile-time constant)
> > > terminator?
> > Why does the terminator have to be a compile-time constant?
> I was hesitant about suggesting a generalisation which added run-time
> overhead over only supporting '\0'.
> Also, the need is not very common in my experience.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk