|
Boost : |
From: Hendrik Schober (SpamTrap_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-05-25 10:18:04
Oliver Kullmann <O.Kullmann_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> [...]
> But for these "millions of C++ users" Boost is not the right
> choice. The exciting thing about Boost is that it is Avantgarde,
> a good deal of interesting research(!), and not compromising
> on quality. That's at least my understanding of Boost.
Mine is different. Boost contains many things
that should have been in the std lib to begin
with. I want these things to be widely used,
so that I don't have to deal with so much bad
code. Who should use smart pointers if not
those who aren't avantgarde???
(AFAIK, boost is distrubuted as part of the
Indesign SDK. You won't reuire all Indesign
plugin developers to be avantgarde, will you?)
> [...]
> Oliver
Schobi
-- SpamTrap_at_[hidden] is never read I'm Schobi at suespammers dot org "Coming back to where you started is not the same as never leaving" Terry Pratchett
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk