From: David Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-05-25 14:33:54
christopher diggins <cdiggins_at_[hidden]> writes:
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Neal Becker" <ndbecker2_at_[hidden]>
>>> What I really want, is a header only version of boost for download. I am
>>> allergic to linking, and I simply don't use any part of boost that can't
>>> be simply included.
>> In that case your problem is solved. Just untar boost. Done.
> Unfortunately some libraries are not header only and there is easy way to
> tell which libraries require separate compilation / linking steps and which
> don't. I would very much like a separate release which only contained header
> only libraries.
Don't you think assembling a separate release of boost just so you can
tell which libraries need to be compiled is a bit of a heavyweight
approach? Seems to me a little documentation should be sufficient.
-- Dave Abrahams Boost Consulting www.boost-consulting.com
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk