From: Fabio Fracassi (f.fracassi_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-05-26 05:48:06
David Abrahams wrote:
> "Hendrik Schober" <SpamTrap_at_[hidden]> writes:
>> Caleb Epstein <caleb.epstein_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>> spit out a lengthy messagethat that I have an
>> incorrect configuration. It couldn't find Python.
>> Mhmm. Do I need this? Will it even work without
>> Python? (I know it will. But not from the guide.)
> Well the message you *actually* get is:
> skipping Boost.Python library build due to _missing_ _or_
> _incorrect_ configuration
> followed by some other stuff. So if that is insufficient to make it
> clear that the build will will work even without Python, what do we
> need to do in order to make it clear?
Perhaps the output should be something like the current linux kernel or
kde's build systems output:
Building boost_program_options ... [ok]
Building boost_pyhton ... [skipped]
Couldn't find an installation of Python, which is needed for this target.
If you don't use Boost.Python you don't have to worry about this.
Building boost_spirit ... [ok]
> Should the tool be silent while building unless it encounters an
I think so. Perhaps provide a --verbose options which also states which
commands get executed.
> Perhaps a string of dots, just so you know there's progress?
I like "Building <target_name> ..." better.
>> Now I would need to link to this stuff. But where
>> exactly do I need to point my linker at?
> Really, is there something unclear about
> I can't imagine how we could make this clearer. Can you help?
Perhaps output something like:
Installed Boost 1.33 into "C:\Boost".
Headers are installed in "C:\Boost\include\boost-1_33"
Libraries are installed in "C:\Boost\lib"
add this to your PATH for automatic linking.
at the end of the bjam run?
>> Conclusion: I have seen smoother installations on
> Certainly. We should be providing an installer with pre-built
>> I have installed easier to build libs, and
>> I have seen guides that weren't written for mere
Lucky you. ;) I have yet to find an binary install which realy works out of
the box, under all circumstances, and a Guide which helps in the cases
where the installer crashes, or doesn't do the right thing.
I found the boost installation under windows quite easy, compared to some
other libs I had to install, but that might be because i don't know Windows
too well, and found installing libraries under Windows quite complicated in
comparison with Linux.
Just my ?0.02
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk