[boost] Re: Customer Friendlier Boost Installation

From: Hendrik Schober (SpamTrap_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-05-27 03:51:32

David Abrahams <dave_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> Jonathan Wakely <cow_at_[hidden]> writes:
>
> > Attached patch implements the idea I proposed below, in case it's
> > wanted.
>
> Now that I look at it, I guess its effectiveness will be vastly
> reduced if we don't implement naming consistency for vc6 and 7, right?

  Yes, definitely. And how about extending this (or
  coming up with another scheme) so that it equally
  applies to all tool sets? Because my next question
  would be: How do I build for GCC 3.3.3 and 3.4.X?
  And does "cw" really apply to CW6, 7, 8, and 9???

> [...]

  Schobi

-- 
SpamTrap_at_[hidden] is never read
I'm Schobi at suespammers dot org
"Coming back to where you started is not the same as never leaving"
 Terry Pratchett