|
Boost : |
From: Arkadiy Vertleyb (vertleyb_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-05-27 05:45:56
"David Abrahams" <dave_at_[hidden]> wrote
> "Arkadiy Vertleyb" <vertleyb_at_[hidden]> writes:
> > I think they are:
> >
> > template<class T>
> > char foo(vector<T>& v)[id1][id2][id3];
>
> That's not a partial specialization; it's an overload.
Right, I used wrong terminology.
> It's different
> from a specialization in that all the overloads need to be visible
> before the point of use unless you are going to use ADL to look up the
> function.
That maybe OK for typeof. The bigger problem is that they are not matched
as strictly as specializations do. For example a derived class can be
matched, etc.
Regards,
Arkadiy
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk