From: Andrey Melnikov (melnikov_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-05-27 12:24:37
David Abrahams wrote:
> Just a question of how much effort we want to invest in a dying
> Boost.Build v1 -- all of this is better in BBv2 -- and, of course, a
> volunteer to do the work.
From the documentation it looks like BBv2 is an experimental thing. I
even didn't know that it supports vc versions other than vc6 until I
looked in toolset Jam file.
If it is stable and does support vc 7.0, 7.1 and 8.0, why everybody is
talking about v1 here?
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk