Boost :

francis.andre_at_[hidden]

-- 
Francis ANDRE
ICQ#    99389956
Skype:  zosrothko
A good friend will come bail you out of jail..........
but, a true friend....will be sitting next to you saying:
 "...that was fun."
"David Abrahams" <dave_at_[hidden]> a écrit dans le message de 
news: ull61c69t.fsf_at_boost-consulting.com...
> "Francis ANDRE" <francis.andre_at_[hidden]> writes:
>
>> Hi Robert
>>
>> I ask again for any help on this point since I am now stack with this 
>> error.
>>
>> Join my previous mail and your answer about this integral_c_tag
>>
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>> Hi Robert
>>
>> I got this error from error C2039: 'integral_c_tag' : n'est pas membre de
>> 'boost::mpl'
>>
>> Here the beginning of level.hpp I got:
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> ------
>> #include <boost/mpl/int.hpp>
>> #include <boost/mpl/integral_c.hpp>
>> #include <boost/serialization/level_enum.hpp>
>> #include <boost/serialization/traits.hpp>
>> namespace boost {
>>     namespace serialization {
>>     // default serialization implementation level
>>     template<class T>
>>     struct implementation_level {
>>     template<class U>
>>     struct traits_class_level {
>>     typedef BOOST_DEDUCED_TYPENAME U::level type;
>> };
>> typedef mpl::integral_c_tag tag;
>> // <== problem here
>> // #if BOOST_WORKAROUND(__IBMCPP__, BOOST_TESTED_AT(600))
>> // typedef
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> --------
>>
>>>From what I check of the latest HEAD release from CVS,  it should be
>> integral_c instead of integral_c_tag??
>>
>> Regards
>>
>> FA
>> _______________________________________________
>> Francis ANDRE wrote:
>>> Hi Robert
>>>
>>> I got this error from error C2039: 'integral_c_tag' : n'est pas
>>> membre de 'boost::mpl'
>>>
>>>
>>>> From what I check of the latest HEAD release from CVS,  it should be
>>> integral_c instead of integral_c_tag??
>>>
>>
>> Hmmm - I looked into this and I don't think its an error.  level and
>> tracking are mpl  "integer types" with special "sauce" and I think that 
>> this
>> is what ineger_c_tag is meant to be used for.  Also I note that none of 
>> our
>> tests flag this as an error.  I'm not all together sure about this so 
>> anyone
>> is free to help out here.
>
> Well, Robert, the docs admittedly never say where you should find
> integral_c_tag (it's only mentioned in
> http://www.boost.org/libs/mpl/doc/tutorial/numeric-metafunction.html
> AFAICT), but it seems pretty obvious to me that you shouldn't expect to
> get integral_c_tag just because you #included integral_c.hpp.  Maybe
>
>    #include <boost/mpl/integral_c_tag.hpp>
>
> would help?
>
> Francis, if you add that to the beginning of level.hpp, does it fix
> the problem?
>
> -- 
> Dave Abrahams
> Boost Consulting
> www.boost-consulting.com
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Unsubscribe & other changes: 
> http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
>