|
Boost : |
From: David Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-05-29 18:21:16
Cromwell Enage <sponage_at_[hidden]> writes:
>> That's alarming! But do you mean that the compiler
>> gets slow (and if so, which compiler?), or are you
>> actually saying that the parameter library induces
>> runtime costs that slow down WxWidgets programs to a
>> crawl? That's almost impossible for me to believe.
>
> Did I say that the compiler "grinds to a halt"?
No, but people are often imprecise so I didn't know what you meant.
> I meant that the executable "runs into a brick wall", or "hangs".
>
> But that was when I ran the tests using the old version
> (Boost.NamedParams).
>
> The tests now run just fine using the current version
> (Boost.Parameter).
Whew!
> So, sorry for the noise.
Not at all! If recent changes hadn't fixed the problem by chance, it
would have been very important to know about it.
-- Dave Abrahams Boost Consulting www.boost-consulting.com
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk