From: Johannes Brunen (jbrunen_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-06-01 02:24:39
"Rob Stewart" <stewart_at_[hidden]> schrieb im Newsbeitrag
> From: "Andy Little" <andy_at_[hidden]>
>> There were 3 reviews, all in favour of accepting the library.
> While I'm not questioning the value of accepting this library
> specifically, doesn't it seem less than ideal to accept a library
> that -- for whatever reasons -- garnered only three reviews?
IMHO, not the number of reviews count, but their quality.
> While the library was truly peer reviewed, and the reviews were
> by knowledgeable folk, the base of input is narrow as a result.
> Should this be the norm?
Is there anything like a norm? I think that it strongly depends on
the libraries domain.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk