Boost logo

Boost :

From: Rob Stewart (stewart_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-05-31 16:33:19

From: "Andy Little" <andy_at_[hidden]>
> I am pleased to formally announce that the Typeof library has been accepted into
> Boost.

Congratulations Arkadiy and Peder.

> There were 3 reviews, all in favour of accepting the library.

While I'm not questioning the value of accepting this library
specifically, doesn't it seem less than ideal to accept a library
that -- for whatever reasons -- garnered only three reviews?

While the library was truly peer reviewed, and the reviews were
by knowledgeable folk, the base of input is narrow as a result.
Should this be the norm?

Rob Stewart                           stewart_at_[hidden]
Software Engineer           
Susquehanna International Group, LLP  using std::disclaimer;

Boost list run by bdawes at, gregod at, cpdaniel at, john at