From: Rob Stewart (stewart_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-05-31 16:33:19
From: "Andy Little" <andy_at_[hidden]>
> I am pleased to formally announce that the Typeof library has been accepted into
Congratulations Arkadiy and Peder.
> There were 3 reviews, all in favour of accepting the library.
While I'm not questioning the value of accepting this library
specifically, doesn't it seem less than ideal to accept a library
that -- for whatever reasons -- garnered only three reviews?
While the library was truly peer reviewed, and the reviews were
by knowledgeable folk, the base of input is narrow as a result.
Should this be the norm?
-- Rob Stewart stewart_at_[hidden] Software Engineer http://www.sig.com Susquehanna International Group, LLP using std::disclaimer;
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk