From: Tom Brinkman (reportbase_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-06-01 15:28:28
Andy Little wrote:
> Three positive reviews is not sufficient in my opinion. However,
> the precedent has already be set, as other libraries have been approved on
> a similar limited number of reviews.
>>Obvious questions in response to this...
>>How many reviews are sufficient?
>> What proportion in favour/against acceptance is acceptable?
The judgement of the library's review manager is the final determinent.
The criteria that he/she used to accept or reject the submission
should be clearly stated in the review managers report after the
review period is over.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk