From: Andy Little (andy_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-06-06 09:54:45
"Tom Brinkman" <reportbase_at_[hidden]> wrote
> Andy Little wrote:
>> Three positive reviews is not sufficient in my opinion. However,
>> the precedent has already be set, as other libraries have been approved on
>> a similar limited number of reviews.
>>>Obvious questions in response to this...
>>>How many reviews are sufficient?
>>> What proportion in favour/against acceptance is acceptable?
> The judgement of the library's review manager is the final determinent.
> The criteria that he/she used to accept or reject the submission
> should be clearly stated in the review managers report after the
> review period is over.
Yes. In retrospect I could have done a lot better. I should not have allowed
modifications to the library or the documentation during the review.
My report was also severely lacking in detail. With benefit of experience, I
shall try to do better next time.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk