From: Howard Hinnant (hinnant_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-06-02 12:22:09
On Jun 1, 2005, at 9:28 PM, Jonathan Turkanis wrote:
> Howard Hinnant wrote:
>> On Jun 1, 2005, at 6:31 PM, Jonathan Turkanis wrote:
>>> So who's right -- Metrowerks or everyone else?
>> I believe everyone else is. This snippet compiles on a more recent
>> internal compiler.
>> I looked around for a workaround, but haven't come up with one yet.
> Thanks, Howard.
> I've found a workaround for my current application: using finite state
> as filters. Can I conclude from your statement about the internal
> compiler that
> the problem also exists in CodeWarrior 9.5, so that I should use
> TESTED_AT(0x3206) to guard my workaround?
I haven't specifically tested CW 9.5. But my best guess is that this
won't be corrected until __MWERKS__ >= 0x4000.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk