From: Jonathan Turkanis (technews_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-06-01 20:28:40
Howard Hinnant wrote:
> On Jun 1, 2005, at 6:31 PM, Jonathan Turkanis wrote:
>> So who's right -- Metrowerks or everyone else?
> I believe everyone else is. This snippet compiles on a more recent
> internal compiler.
> I looked around for a workaround, but haven't come up with one yet.
I've found a workaround for my current application: using finite state machines
as filters. Can I conclude from your statement about the internal compiler that
the problem also exists in CodeWarrior 9.5, so that I should use
TESTED_AT(0x3206) to guard my workaround?
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk