From: Daniel James (daniel_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-06-06 03:03:55
Jonathan Turkanis wrote:
> Dave Harris wrote:
>>Really? My impression was that TR1 had not been reviewed in detail.
>>When the hashing library was submitted to boost, I understood it to be the
>>same as TR1 yet we found several problems with it. We did not blindly
>>accept it just because it was in TR1.
> Work on TR1 is finished. The hash library is not part of TR1.
I haven't been following this thread, and Dave's email program has
broken the threading, so I'm missing the context here. But std::hash is
specified in section 6.3.2 of TR1 (a little confusing as it's in the
header <functional> but specified in the container section). None of
Dave's objections to Boost.Hash applied to the TR1 specification, all of
them were with the implementation or the extensions. And I think the
distinction was pretty clear.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk