From: Jonathan Turkanis (technews_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-06-06 11:18:04
Daniel James wrote:
> Jonathan Turkanis wrote:
>> Dave Harris wrote:
>>> Really? My impression was that TR1 had not been reviewed in detail.
>>> When the hashing library was submitted to boost, I understood it to
>>> be the same as TR1 yet we found several problems with it. We did
>>> not blindly accept it just because it was in TR1.
>> Work on TR1 is finished. The hash library is not part of TR1.
> I haven't been following this thread, and Dave's email program has
> broken the threading, so I'm missing the context here. But std::hash
> is specified in section 6.3.2 of TR1 (a little confusing as it's in
> the header <functional> but specified in the container section). None of
> Dave's objections to Boost.Hash applied to the TR1 specification, all
> of them were with the implementation or the extensions. And I think the
> distinction was pretty clear.
Sorry for being unclear. I was talking the extensions.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk