From: Brian Braatz (brianb_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-06-06 21:17:32
> -----Original Message-----
> From: boost-bounces_at_[hidden]
> On Behalf Of Jonathan Turkanis
> Brian Braatz wrote:
> > Here is an idea: what-cha think- We should add a "Wow" factor to the
> > lib review template.
> > I dunno, maybe something like
> > "Rate the WOW factor of this library:(1-5)"
> > (now that I have made the suggestion, here comes the controversy
> > (grin))
> > the question then becomes what if a library, gets all 1's. Does it
> > still get accepted? I say no, there are plenty of "YET-ANOTHER-X"
> > out there already.
> > I say, (more controversy) that something can have a semi-boring
> > functional use, but it's implementation, at the very least should
> > some "Wow" in it.
> Most people seems to agree we need a bigint library. Somehow I'm
> can find one with a WOW factor above 2. ;-)
[Brian Braatz Writes:]
Oh I dunno, to me a big int is EXCITING (grin).
(yes your point is in alignment with the second point I made against my
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk