From: Brian Braatz (brianb_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-06-06 21:19:52
> -----Original Message-----
> From: boost-bounces_at_[hidden]
> On Behalf Of Jonathan Turkanis
> Sent: Monday, June 06, 2005 4:53 PM
> To: boost_at_[hidden]
> Subject: [boost] Re: Re: Typeof: Review result
> Brian Braatz wrote:
> > Here is an idea: what-cha think- We should add a "Wow" factor to the
> > lib review template.
> > I dunno, maybe something like
> > "Rate the WOW factor of this library:(1-5)"
> > (now that I have made the suggestion, here comes the controversy
> > (grin))
> > the question then becomes what if a library, gets all 1's. Does it
> > still get accepted? I say no, there are plenty of "YET-ANOTHER-X"
> > out there already.
> > I say, (more controversy) that something can have a semi-boring
> > functional use, but it's implementation, at the very least should
> > some "Wow" in it.
> Most people seems to agree we need a bigint library. Somehow I'm
> can find one with a WOW factor above 2. ;-)
[Brian Braatz Writes:]
Hmm.. ON a serious note. It might be worth just "Capturing" the WOW
factor, and using that as one piece of the "do we accept" or not puzzle.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk