|
Boost : |
From: Lorenzo Bettini (bettini_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-06-07 08:11:43
David Abrahams wrote:
> Lorenzo Bettini <bettini_at_[hidden]> writes:
>
>
>>David Abrahams wrote:
>>
>>>Can you deal with deallocation of the whole network at once? It often
>>>works to maintain the nodes (C objects) in a container like a deque
>>>and let them link to one another with raw pointers.
>>>Otherwise you may be in need of a real GC.
>>>
>>
>>I solved the problem in a (probably) not too elegant way: when I know
>>that I'm creating objects with mutual dependences say A and B I store
>>weak pointers, and I store a shared pointer to A and B into a list. As
>>long as the list survives the weak pointers are still valid. When I
>>want to deallocate everything, all I have to do is to deallocate the
>>list. This worked, and also valgrind says there are no leaks...
>
>
> The smart pointers may not be buying you much of anything in that
> case.
>
so what could be an alternative?
Lore
-- +-----------------------------------------------------+ | Lorenzo Bettini ICQ# lbetto, 16080134 | | PhD in Computer Science | | Dip. Sistemi e Informatica, Univ. di Firenze | | Florence - Italy (GNU/Linux User # 158233) | | Home Page : http://www.lorenzobettini.it | | http://music.dsi.unifi.it XKlaim language | | http://www.lorenzobettini.it/purple Cover Band | | http://www.gnu.org/software/src-highlite | | http://www.gnu.org/software/gengetopt | | http://www.lorenzobettini.it/software/gengen | | http://www.lorenzobettini.it/software/doublecpp | +-----------------------------------------------------+
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk