Re: [boost] [typeof][result_of] Separated at Birth?

From: Douglas Gregor (doug.gregor_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-06-09 12:18:42

On Jun 9, 2005, at 11:49 AM, David Abrahams wrote:
> It seems to me that when BOOST_TYPEOF becomes available,
> boost::result_of should use it in its default implementation,
> something like:
>
>   template <class F, class A>
>   struct result_of<F(A)>
>   {
>       typedef typename BOOST_TYPEOF(make<F>() ( make<A>() ) ) type;
>   };
>
> Is that in the plan?

Absolutely.

        Doug