From: David Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-06-15 15:45:45
I don't remember whether I expressed these concerns earlier, but I
don't think most of the names ought to have been in namespace boost.
For example, names like range_xxxx are crying out for a range::
namespace in which to put a component called xxxx. Also, names like
begin and end are so general and important that I think they should
have been in boost::range, with perhaps an optional header that brings
them into namespace boost via using declaration.
-- Dave Abrahams Boost Consulting www.boost-consulting.com
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk