From: David Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-06-15 17:29:33
"Thorsten Ottosen" <nesotto_at_[hidden]> writes:
> "David Abrahams" <dave_at_[hidden]> wrote in message
> | "Thorsten Ottosen" <nesotto_at_[hidden]> writes:
> | > would it be correct to implement the binary operators in my "wrapping"
> | > iterators
> | > as function templates.
> | It would be correct to use iterator_adaptor. Why aren't you doing
> | that?
> because I need to apply a cast form void* to T* in operator*() and
Seems like a perfect job for transform_iterator to me.
-- Dave Abrahams Boost Consulting www.boost-consulting.com
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk