Re: [boost] [python] Tru64/CXX function template issues

From: Ralf W. Grosse-Kunstleve (rwgk_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-06-15 17:24:37

--- Markus Schöpflin <markus.schoepflin_at_[hidden]> wrote:

> Ralf W. Grosse-Kunstleve wrote:
> 
> > I am using Boost.Python all the time under Tru64 with cxx 6.5, and have
> been
> > doing so for many years. I guess there must be a difference in how we
> compile.
> > I am not using bjam but a SCons-based build system. The result of building
> with
> > the Boost CVS from earlier this morning, including the cxx commands, is
> here:
> > 
> >
> http://cci.lbl.gov/cctbx_build/results/2005_06_15_0643/tru64_py241_build_log
> > 
> > All our regression tests (many) passed.
> 
> Could you please try the sample I posted and tell me if it compiles and 
> links ok with your compiler version?

% cxx -V
Compaq C++ V6.5-042 for Compaq Tru64 UNIX V5.1 (Rev. 732)
Compiler Driver V6.5-042 (cxx) cxx Driver

% cat z.cpp
void foo(int);
template <class T> void foo(T) { foo(0); }

int main()
{
   foo(0);
}

% cxx -std strict_ansi -tlocal -O2 -fast z.cpp
ld:
Unresolved:
foo(int)

% cxx -std strict_ansi -tlocal z.cpp
ld:
Unresolved:
foo(int)

% cxx -std strict_ansi z.cpp
ld:
Unresolved:
foo(int)

% cxx -std strict_ansi -model ansi z.cpp
ld:
Unresolved:
foo(int)

% cxx -std ansi z.cpp
% a.out # takes "forever"

% cxx z.cpp
% a.out # takes "forever"

It seems to be important to use "strict_ansi". That's what I have been using
for Boost.Python compilation all the time.

Cheers,
        Ralf

                
__________________________________ 
Discover Yahoo! 
Use Yahoo! to plan a weekend, have fun online and more. Check it out! 
http://discover.yahoo.com/