From: Markus Schöpflin (markus.schoepflin_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-06-16 08:16:03
Ralf W. Grosse-Kunstleve wrote:
> It seems to be important to use "strict_ansi". That's what I have been using
> for Boost.Python compilation all the time.
Got a statement from the compiler support team:
In the default relaxed ansi mode, we are more permissive and support the
ARM non-standard feature named "guiding declaration".
So while the non-template function declaration is seen, the definition is
still supplied by the template function.
In the strict_ansi mode, we conform to the ISO standard and look to the
non-template function for a definition.
Seems like we might have to do the switch to strict_ansi, then.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk