Re: [boost] [function types][review]

From: Tobias Schwinger (tschwinger_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-06-18 10:25:33

Hi Dave,

thanks already for your use case description (it would've been the next thing 
for me to ask for).

I'll get back to this in more detail, later. Just a quick note to ensure we 
understand each other correctly:

David Abrahams wrote:
> Tobias Schwinger <tschwinger_at_[hidden]> writes:
> 
> 
>>Dave's point is (I hope I summarize this accurately, please correct me if not) 
>>to put the class type into the sequence of parameters adding (cv-qualifications 
>>- but we all agree on this
> 
> 
> I must've missed when that happened
> 

"we all agree on this" refers to cv-qualifying the class type, here.

Regards,

Tobias