From: Tobias Schwinger (tschwinger_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-06-18 10:25:33
thanks already for your use case description (it would've been the next thing
for me to ask for).
I'll get back to this in more detail, later. Just a quick note to ensure we
understand each other correctly:
David Abrahams wrote:
> Tobias Schwinger <tschwinger_at_[hidden]> writes:
>>Dave's point is (I hope I summarize this accurately, please correct me if not)
>>to put the class type into the sequence of parameters adding (cv-qualifications
>>- but we all agree on this
> I must've missed when that happened
"we all agree on this" refers to cv-qualifying the class type, here.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk