Re: [boost] [function types] Formal Review begins today.

From: Tobias Schwinger (tschwinger_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-06-19 05:49:47

Tobias Schwinger wrote:
> Andy Little wrote:
> 
>>"Tobias Schwinger" <tschwinger_at_[hidden]> wrote
>>
>>
>>
>>>Ah - thanks! We'll want to use this instead of function_type_arity, so 
>>>default
>>>arguments work. Adding an assertion that the arity of the function is 
>>>greater or
>>>equal to the number of elements in the tuple would be nice.
>>
>>
>>Unfortunately because its a pointer to a function it wont handle the 
>>default args, at least not in my test above.
>>(OTOH this sounds reasonably sensible)
> 
> 
> 
>      <WHUMMM>Stupid me</WHUMM>
> 
> Of course!
> 
> 

You can, however, check if it's a variadic function pointer and in this call 
allow any number of tuple elements....

Regards,

Tobias