Re: [boost] [function types] Formal Review begins today.

From: Tobias Schwinger (tschwinger_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-06-18 15:42:55

Andy Little wrote:
> 
> "Tobias Schwinger" <tschwinger_at_[hidden]> wrote
> 
> 
>> Ah - thanks! We'll want to use this instead of function_type_arity, so 
>> default
>> arguments work. Adding an assertion that the arity of the function is 
>> greater or
>> equal to the number of elements in the tuple would be nice.
> 
> 
> Unfortunately because its a pointer to a function it wont handle the 
> default args, at least not in my test above.
> (OTOH this sounds reasonably sensible)

     <WHUMMM>Stupid me</WHUMM>

Of course!

I'm sorry. It seems I'm doing too much things simultanously at present...

Regards,

Tobias