From: Tobias Schwinger (tschwinger_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-06-18 15:42:55
Andy Little wrote:
> "Tobias Schwinger" <tschwinger_at_[hidden]> wrote
>> Ah - thanks! We'll want to use this instead of function_type_arity, so
>> arguments work. Adding an assertion that the arity of the function is
>> greater or
>> equal to the number of elements in the tuple would be nice.
> Unfortunately because its a pointer to a function it wont handle the
> default args, at least not in my test above.
> (OTOH this sounds reasonably sensible)
I'm sorry. It seems I'm doing too much things simultanously at present...
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk