From: Larry Evans (cppljevans_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-06-20 05:25:57
On 06/20/2005 04:25 AM, Maksym Motornyy wrote:
>>search for "don't work with enumeration types:"
> Since enumerators in my library are plain classes there is no problem to
> use them with MPL. Even more, mpl::vector is used to define their
> sequence order (policy::enumerators typedef).
Hmm... This sounds like it might work for me. I'll take a closer
>>in range_all.zip. If your enumerators can be used to make tuples or
>>variants with "named" fields, as done in the:
>>in the vault, I'd be interested.
> I can't swear I understand what is your goal. The test code is a bit
> hard to read. Could you explain, please?
Sorry about that. Is it hard to read because of:
a) the formatting
b) lack of commenting
c) use of template metaprogramming
or all three? Of course I understand it needs more comments, but it was
uploaded in order to reference from:
where the first paragraph of my reponse hopefully makes the *goal* a
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk