From: Fernando Cacciola (fernando_cacciola_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-06-20 07:43:03
David Abrahams wrote:
>> It used to work a few days ago (ca. 2-4). If this is not something
>> obvious I
>> could try to find out which CVS commit lead to the regression.
> Well, it's complaining that unsigned long long is not a numeric type.
> I can't for the life of me understand why boost::numeric_cast is still
> hanging around in cast.hpp when we have another one (that actually
> works!) in boost/numeric/conversion/cast.hpp. This seems like fodder
> for ODR violations. Fernando, what's up with this? Why haven't you
> replaced the one in cast.hpp with an #include?
I've never got to silently replace the old numeric_cast becasue mine is
totally unusable with VC6, BC5.6.4 and gcc2.92
I've always planned to get it to work with those compilers, but I never had
the time :-)
But it's been a long long time now (wow)...
So I better do something about it.
I see 3 options here:
(1) Keep to old code and use it as a fallback implementation for broken
(2) Try to fix the new code for those compilers (hardest)
(3) Just remove the old cast code and redirect the include to the new one
(having broken compilers stop working)
Since (the old) numeric_cast<> is currently working (at least to some
extent) with those compilers, and there can still be users around (specially
bcc5.6.4), (3) is just not an option I think.
I only has access to bcc5.6.4 so I can make this one work, but I can't fix
the code for VC6 and gcc2.92 as I don't have them here.
Although the new library has many options and features, the new
numeric_cast<> is just a checked static_cast<>, and the new library is
better there only in that it checks more reliably; therefore, I guess (1) is
good tradeof given this point in the release.
(Part of the reason the old code works with broken compilers but not the new
one is because the old code uses a custom version of numeric_limits for
broken libraries... the new code just doesn't and I prefered to have such
fixes elsewhere (like in limits.hpp))
What do you think?
P.S.: Thank you David for the private prompt. Two weeks ago our second son
was born and I'm just now getting back to work life so I totally missed this
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk