Boost :

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

From: Eric Niebler (eric_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-06-20 09:38:48

Next message: Maxim Yegorushkin: "Re: [boost] [lexical_cast] specializing"
Previous message: Larry Evans: "Re: [boost] Typesafe enums proposal"
In reply to: Caleb Epstein: "Re: [boost] [regex] Boost.Regex and TR1 fundamentally broken?"
Next in thread: Caleb Epstein: "Re: [boost] [regex] Boost.Regex and TR1 fundamentally broken?"
Reply: Caleb Epstein: "Re: [boost] [regex] Boost.Regex and TR1 fundamentally broken?"

Caleb Epstein wrote:
>
> Not meaning to be facetious, but why in heavens name would anyone want
> to use a character class like [E-f] or [Z-a]? Seriously, does anyone
> write regexps like this?

ECMA-262 calls this case out specifically, and AFAICT there is no
reasonable way a TR1-compliant regex package can conform. Do you really
think that's not a big deal?

-- 
Eric Niebler
Boost Consulting
www.boost-consulting.com

Next message: Maxim Yegorushkin: "Re: [boost] [lexical_cast] specializing"
Previous message: Larry Evans: "Re: [boost] Typesafe enums proposal"
In reply to: Caleb Epstein: "Re: [boost] [regex] Boost.Regex and TR1 fundamentally broken?"
Next in thread: Caleb Epstein: "Re: [boost] [regex] Boost.Regex and TR1 fundamentally broken?"
Reply: Caleb Epstein: "Re: [boost] [regex] Boost.Regex and TR1 fundamentally broken?"

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk