Boost logo

Boost :

From: Caleb Epstein (caleb.epstein_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-06-20 10:39:22


On 6/20/05, Eric Niebler <eric_at_[hidden]> wrote:

> ECMA-262 calls this case out specifically, and AFAICT there is no
> reasonable way a TR1-compliant regex package can conform. Do you really
> think that's not a big deal?

Its hardly my place to say, but I think anyone who writes regular
expressions in that way is a lunatic. Clearly, supporting a standard
should hold more weight than my own value judgements though :-)

-- 
Caleb Epstein
caleb dot epstein at gmail dot com

Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk