Boost :

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

From: Markus Schöpflin (markus.schoepflin_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-06-20 12:57:52

Next message: H. van Niekerk: "[boost] shared_ptr question"
Previous message: Jonathan Turkanis: "Re: [boost] [random][iostreams][tru64cxx]"
In reply to: John Maddock: "Re: [boost] [config] Why does BOOST_NO_INTEGRAL_INT64_T dependonBOOST_HAS_LONG_LONG?"
Next in thread: Markus Schöpflin: "Re: [boost] [config] Why does BOOST_NO_INTEGRAL_INT64_T dependonBOOST_HAS_LONG_LONG?"

John Maddock wrote:

>>Currently, Tru64/CXX strict mode compilation is affected by this. So why
>>not just try it and if there are too much failures, revert it back?

> If you're willing to deal with the regressions, and the review manager
> agrees, then it's OK with me: but check with Doug Gregor first.

Doug, are you listening?

Next message: H. van Niekerk: "[boost] shared_ptr question"
Previous message: Jonathan Turkanis: "Re: [boost] [random][iostreams][tru64cxx]"
In reply to: John Maddock: "Re: [boost] [config] Why does BOOST_NO_INTEGRAL_INT64_T dependonBOOST_HAS_LONG_LONG?"
Next in thread: Markus Schöpflin: "Re: [boost] [config] Why does BOOST_NO_INTEGRAL_INT64_T dependonBOOST_HAS_LONG_LONG?"

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk