From: Markus Schöpflin (markus.schoepflin_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-06-21 02:23:47
John Maddock wrote:
>>Currently, Tru64/CXX strict mode compilation is affected by this. So why
>>not just try it and if there are too much failures, revert it back?
> If you're willing to deal with the regressions, and the review manager
> agrees, then it's OK with me: but check with Doug Gregor first.
I had another idea. I'll change the code in question to:
#if !defined(BOOST_HAS_LONG_LONG) && !defined(BOOST_NO_INTEGRAL_INT64_T) \
# define BOOST_NO_INTEGRAL_INT64_T
This will leave other compilers/platforms alone and works around the issue
on Tru64/CXX. And of course I'll add a comment that the whole thing should
be removed after the release.
Is this ok with you?
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk