Boost :

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

From: John Maddock (john_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-06-21 05:36:09

Next message: John Maddock: "Re: [boost] [type_traits] Preliminary patch to work around GCC Bug 8503 and a minor feature request"
Previous message: John Maddock: "Re: [boost] [function_types][review] TODO-list & new interface draft"
In reply to: Markus Schöpflin: "Re: [boost] [config] Why does BOOST_NO_INTEGRAL_INT64_T dependonBOOST_HAS_LONG_LONG?"
Next in thread: Markus Schöpflin: "Re: [boost] [config] Why does BOOST_NO_INTEGRAL_INT64_TdependonBOOST_HAS_LONG_LONG?"
Reply: Markus Schöpflin: "Re: [boost] [config] Why does BOOST_NO_INTEGRAL_INT64_TdependonBOOST_HAS_LONG_LONG?"
Reply: Markus Schöpflin: "Re: [boost] [config] Why does BOOST_NO_INTEGRAL_INT64_TdependonBOOST_HAS_LONG_LONG?"

> This will leave other compilers/platforms alone and works around the issue
> on Tru64/CXX. And of course I'll add a comment that the whole thing should
> be removed after the release.
>
> Is this ok with you?

Sounds more sensible at this stage of the release, don't let me forget about
this post release though!

John.

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk