From: John Maddock (john_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-06-24 06:50:40
> Hmm, seems the other way round. Is this how it should be?
Ah! I think I have an idea what's going on here: even with BOOST_NO_CONFIG
defined some options get defined in suffix.hpp; for example if there's no
long long then there's no numeric_limits<long long> either, and this is
messing up the configure script logic, I believe the configure script is now
fixed in cvs.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk