Re: [boost] [config] BOOST_NO_LONG_LONG_NUMERIC_LIMITS notdetectedcorrectly?

From: John Maddock (john_at_[hidden])
Date: 2005-06-24 06:50:40

> Hmm, seems the other way round. Is this how it should be?

Ah!  I think I have an idea what's going on here: even with BOOST_NO_CONFIG 
defined some options get defined in suffix.hpp; for example if there's no 
long long then there's no numeric_limits<long long> either, and this is 
messing up the configure script logic, I believe the configure script is now 
fixed in cvs.

John.